- Escambia County Public Schools
- Employee Evaluations
- Final Employee Evaluation Rating & Score
Human Resource Services
Page Navigation
- Home
- Employment Information
- Employment Application Process
- Hiring Guidelines
- ECPS HR Forms
- Employee Evaluations
- Federal State Compliance Packet
- Fingerprinting & Badging
- New Hire Process
- Information for Coaches
- Teaching Employment Opportunities
- Reporting Misconduct
- Labor Relations & Collective Bargaining
Final Employee Evaluation Rating & Score
-
Each employee's final evaluation is the result of the combining or averaging of the two main components of the employee's: professional practices and student growth (with each component being weighted for the final evaluation): (Updated 9-24-16)
1. Employee professional practice rating
This rating is assessed with the Danielson framework as is applied via our Employee Appraisal Rubric through the observation/interaction process. The final appraisal scores are based on the last observation where a given component area was assessed.
E3 - Instructional Professional Practice: Teacher, Instructional Specialist, Media Specialist, School Counselor, Therapeutic Specialist E3 Rubric (observations/artifacts) PDP: Professional Development Plan Surveys (NA) Student Growth Total 65% 2% NA 33% 100% ESPE - Educational Support Personnel Professional Practice: Educational Support Contact Personnel EPE Rubric (observations/artifacts) PDP: Professional Development Plan Surveys (NA) Student Growth Total 100% NA NA NA 100% EPE - Escambia Professional Evaluation Professional Practice: Professional Contact Personnel EPE Rubric (observations/artifacts) Including PDP: Plan for Deliberate Practice PDP: Professional Development Plan Surveys (Employee Engagement & Support Report Card) Student Growth Total 80% Included in the Professional Practice Rubric Scoring 10% 10% 100% ELA - Escambia Leaders Assessment Professional Practice: Curriculum & Instruction School-Based Administrator Contact Personnel ELA Rubric (observations/artifacts) Including PDP: Plan for Deliberate Practice PDP: Professional Development Plan Surveys (Parent Engagement & Employee Engagement) Student Growth Total 57% Included in the Professional Practice Rubric Scoring 10% 33% 100% ELA-D - Escambia Leaders Assessment - District Professional Practice: Curriculum & Instruction District-Based Administrator Contact Personnel EPE Rubric (observations/artifacts) Including PDP: Plan for Deliberate Practice PDP: Professional Development Plan Surveys (Employee Engagement & Support Report Card) Student Growth Total 60% Included in the Professional Practice Rubric Scoring 10% 30% 100% EAE - Escambia Administrator Evaluation Professional Practice: Human Resource, Operations & Finance Administrator Contact Personnel EPE Rubric (observations/artifacts) Including PDP: Plan for Deliberate Practice PDP: Professional Development Plan Surveys (Employee Engagement & Support Report Card) Student Growth Total 60% Included in the Professional Practice Rubric Scoring 20% 20% 100% ELA-D - Escambia Leaders Assessment - District Professional Practice: Curriculum & Instruction District-Based Administrator Contact Personnel EPE Rubric (observations/artifacts) Including PDP: Plan for Deliberate Practice PDP: Professional Development Plan Surveys (Employee Engagement & Support Report Card) Student Growth Total 60% Included in the Professional Practice Rubric Scoring 10% 30% 100% The scales and rules for maintaining a given effectiveness rating are as follows: (Updated 11-2-17)
Professional Practice Rating: Raw Score: Highly Effective (4 points)
No Unsatisfactory rating*94.5 and above Effective (3 points)
No Unsatisfactory rating*77.5 - 94.4 Needs Improvement / Developing (2 points)
No Unsatisfactory rating*70.5 - 77.4 Unsatisfactory (1 point)
1 or more Unsatisfactory rating*0 - 70.4 *If a teacher's final rating is rated Unsatisfactory in any component at the end of the school year, the overall evaluation preliminary rating will be Unsatisfactory.
**If a teacher's evaluator is a STAR CT, and the teacher has five (5) or more components' final rating at Needs Improvement / Developing, the STAR CT will make a recommendation to the START Review Board to determine if the teacher is to be offered an annual contract for the next school year.(Updated 4-25-16)
Professional Practice Rating: Raw Score: Highly Effective (4 points)
No Unsatisfactory rating*94.5 and above Effective (3 points)
No Unsatisfactory rating*77.5 - 94.4 Needs Improvement / Developing (2 points)
No Unsatisfactory rating*70.5 - 77.4 Unsatisfactory (1 point)
1 or more Unsatisfactory rating*0 - 70.4 2. Student learning growth rating (Updated 10-05-21)
Technical Assistance Paper: 2022-2023 Teacher Evaluation Process - Student Performance
3. Overall effectiveness rating: (Updated 11-02-17)
An educator's overall effectiveness rating is the average of the teo parts of the evaluation: the professional practices and student learning growth portions. For each portion of the evaluation, the rating achieved corresponds to a number (4, 3, 2, 1) that is used to calculate the sum total of the two halves of the evaluation, to yield a final, summative rating, as shown below:
Evaluation Measures Highly Effective Effective NI / Dev Unsat. Employee Appraisal Framework 4 3 2 1 PDP 4 3 2 1 Student Growth 4 3 2 1 Final Rating 3.5 - 4.0 2.5 - 3.49 1.5 - 2.49 1 - 1.49 For example, an employee with a: (Updated 4-25-16)
Highly Effective Employee Appraisal Framework Score (4 point) and a Highly Effective PDP Score, and an Effective Student Growth Score (3 points) would be calculated as follows:(4*0.65) + (4*0.02) + (3*0.33) = 3.67 points for a summative rating of Highly Effective
Professional Practice - 65% PDP - 2% Student Growth - 33% Final Summative Rating - 100% 4 x 0.65 = 2.60 4 x 0.02 = 0.08 3 x 0.33 = 0.99 3.67 = Highly Effective